Chapter 13: Aggregate Planning
Overview
This chapter explains business, sales and operations planning. The different types of aggregate planning strategies are introduced and discussed. Next, the options for changing demand and capacity are presented. The various strategies are then evaluated in terms of costs and impacts on the various business functions. The differences in aggregate planning for services and manufacturing are discussed.
Next, the chapter explains the role and organizational linkages of master production scheduling. The objectives of master production scheduling are presented. The procedure for developing a master production schedule (MPS) is explained. The MPS is then used to perform rough-cut capacity planning in order to find an authorized MPS. Finally, we learn about available-to-promise quantities and how to deal with changes in the MPS later in the process.
Answers to Discussion Questions in Textbook
The strategic business plan is the long-term strategy in terms of revenue, cost and profit objectives. It is important because it is the input into the sales and operations plans.
Sales planning involves decisions concerning the markets served, customer service levels, competitive priorities, profit margins and market share in order to achieve the objectives of the business plan. Sales planning is conducted every 6 to 18 months depending on the firm’s choice of planning period.
Operations planning involves decisions concerning the aggregate production rate, staffing levels, inventory levels, backorders and use of overtime, undertime, subcontracting, hiring and firing that is authorized to support the sales or marketing plan. Operations planning is conducted every 6 to 18 months depending on the firm’s choice of planning period, but may be updated more frequently.
The aggregate or production plan identifies resources needed. The resource decisions are the aggregate production rate, staffing plan and inventory policies.
A composite product is used when developing the aggregate plan in order to minimize the level of detail in the plan. In addition, aggregate plans are usually more accurate than individual product plans since aggregate forecasts of demand are more accurate than forecasts of individual product demands.
These plans are similar since both plans ensure that demand is met. However, they meet demand in different ways. A level plan maintains the same workforce size and equipment, thus producing the same amount of product each time period. This causes inventory to increase when demand is below average and decrease when demand is above average. A chase plan adjusts the size of the workforce and equipment capacities in order to meet the demand rate for each time period. In this plan, inventory is not used to support the plan. Instead, people are hired and fired as needed to deal with changes in demand.
Reactive demand-based options use inventories and backorders to deal with changes in demand. This option causes our inventory costs to increase and our customer service levels to decrease because some orders may be shipped late. The proactive or capacity-based option attempts to shift the demand patterns in order to minimize changes in demand. This option can increase expenses, such as overtime and subcontracting.
The different options are overtime, undertime, subcontracting, hiring and firing. Overtime causes labor expenses to increase since we typically pay time and a half for each overtime hour. Undertime increases the labor cost per unit since we have idle time. Subcontracting costs money since we have to send our product for outside manufacturing. This is usually more costly than the expense of making the product in house. Hiring causes us to incur expenses related to position advertising, interviewing steps and training. Firing expenses may include increased unemployment compensation premiums and severance packages for those fired.
A hybrid aggregate plan uses options from both the level and chase aggregate plans. It is used because we may not prefer to use a level or aggregate plan. We can combine our preferred decisions from each plan.
First, we choose the type of aggregate plan to use. Next, we determine the aggregate production rate based on our choice of aggregate plan. The size of the workforce is calculated based on the type of aggregate plan used. Then we test the aggregate plan to determine its total cost. Finally, we evaluate the plan in terms its impacts on cost, customer service, operations and human resources.
We would want to consider the availability of workers based on the unemployment rate. We would also consider the time and expense involved in hiring and firing workers. The cost of holding inventory should be determined. We should also determine the impact of backorders on customer satisfaction, which can negatively affect future demand.
In services, we can not use inventory buildup as a way of dealing with peaks in demand.
This answer will depend on the area in which the university is located.
This answer will depend on the area in which the university is located.
You must calculate the production rate and workforce size when developing the aggregate plan.
The answer to this question depends on the location of the university.
To create the MPS, we need the aggregate production plan, beginning inventory levels, and the capacity required for each of our products on each resource.
The different sources of demand are customer orders, a forecast of demand, interplant requirements, service part requirements and distribution requirements.
The objectives of the master scheduler are as follows:
These objectives influence the master scheduling decisions in terms of how the demand is satisfied and how capacity is dealt with.
First, we develop a proposed MPS. Then, we use rough-cut capacity planning to determine if we have enough capacity to meet the MPS. If there is not enough capacity, we create an MPS that is feasible in terms of capacity. If there is enough capacity, then the MPS is evaluated in terms of its impact on customer service, its use of resources and inventory investment. If it meets our criteria, then it becomes an authorized MPS.
Rough-cut capacity planning is important because if we do not ensure there is enough capacity for the MPS, then we may have an infeasible MPS. If the MPS were infeasible, we would start experiencing problems on the plant floor. Specifically, items would be finished late, which could cause us to start expediting.
Time fence policies stabilize the MPS. The MPS is divided by the two time fences of demand and planning that cause the MPS to consist of frozen, slushy and liquid zones. The demand time fence separates the frozen and slushy times zones, while the planning fence separates the slushy and liquid time zones. These zones have varying rules regarding the frequency and authorization for making changes.
In the frozen portion of the MPS, you can make infrequent changes that must be authorized by a manager who is responsible for the release of resources to operations. Changes made in this portion could jeopardize existing customer orders.
In the slushy portion of the MPS, we can make changes in the product mix, but not changes that need additional resources. The master scheduler authorizes such changes.
First we need to identify our resources in terms of people of various skill levels and equipment. Next, we decide how to use our resources. To do so, we analyze the demands of our various services and then allocate resources to them. Finally, we make sure that we have developed a schedule that uses our available resources to meet our objectives.
For example, a hospital knows how many surgeries are scheduled (demand) and how many of each type of medical staff are available (resources). We also know how many operating rooms are available and how much of each type of surgical equipment is available. Then, we schedule the operating rooms and staff accordingly. We would also leave some time available in the schedule for emergency surgeries.
Source: http://www.sba.oakland.edu/faculty/wharton/downloads/reidquestions/ch13.doc
Web site to visit: http://www.sba.oakland.edu/
Author of the text: indicated on the source document of the above text
If you are the author of the text above and you not agree to share your knowledge for teaching, research, scholarship (for fair use as indicated in the United States copyrigh low) please send us an e-mail and we will remove your text quickly. Fair use is a limitation and exception to the exclusive right granted by copyright law to the author of a creative work. In United States copyright law, fair use is a doctrine that permits limited use of copyrighted material without acquiring permission from the rights holders. Examples of fair use include commentary, search engines, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, library archiving and scholarship. It provides for the legal, unlicensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author's work under a four-factor balancing test. (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use)
The information of medicine and health contained in the site are of a general nature and purpose which is purely informative and for this reason may not replace in any case, the council of a doctor or a qualified entity legally to the profession.
The texts are the property of their respective authors and we thank them for giving us the opportunity to share for free to students, teachers and users of the Web their texts will used only for illustrative educational and scientific purposes only.
All the information in our site are given for nonprofit educational purposes